Series 4: Box S7.1-S7.3

Subseries Item Date Box Number
The National Law Journal article regarding "Nuclear waste's Legal Fallout" (1982) 1982 S7.1 - S7.3:1
Judge Shigeru Oda and Maritime Boundary Delimitation by Jon Van Dyke (2002) 2002 S7.1 - S7.3:2
Ocean Development & International Law Book Review regarding Thomas A. Clingan's "The Law of the Sea: Ocean Law and Policy" (1994), reviewed by Jon Van Dyke (1997) 1994,
1997
S7.1 - S7.3:3
International Decisions on Ownership of Islands and Maritime Boundary Delimitations, By Jon Van Dyke, prepared for the Korea Law of the Sea Society (1997) 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:4
Letter correspondence between Jon Van Dyke, Sherry P. Broder, and Richard Turbin about "Investigation at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna Conducted on June 22 and 23, 1983 regarding I.A.E.A posture towards the dumping of nuclear waste" (1983) 1983 S7.1 - S7.3:5
The Duty to Cooperate by Jon Van Dyke (1998), 2 copies 1998 S7.1 - S7.3:6
Jon Van Dyke Institute of International Law and Justice Workshop, Agenda (2013) 2013 S7.1 - S7.3:7
Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Hawaii, In the Matter of the Application of Suntrek Tours, Inc. For a Motor Carrier Certificate or Permit, Decision and order No. 16395, No. 97-03 20 (1998); IPCC Geoengineering, National Legislation Relating to OIF, Recent OIF experiments, Activities at IMO, OIF/Geoengineering Generally 1998 S7.1 - S7.3:8
Handwritten note; China Democracy and Legal System Publishing House title page that reads "Maritime Security Issues in the South China Sea and the Arctic: Sharpened competition or collaboration?"; Article regarding "Regional Cooperation in the South China Sea and the Arctic Ocean" by Jon Van Dyke; S7.1 - S7.3:9
Jeju Symposium's Yeosu Declaration - "The Living Ocean and Coast" - Ocean and Coast Best Practices - Regional Sea Arrangements for North east Asia by Jon Van Dyke (2009) 2009 S7.1 - S7.3:10
Email correspondence between RSIS Commentaries and RSIS-Commentaries about a RSIS commentaries article regarding "South China Sea Diplomacy: More Needs to be Done" (2011) 2011 S7.1 - S7.3:11
5th Global Conference on Oceans, Coasts, and Islands: Ensuring Survival, Preserving Life, and Improving Governance, Co-Chairs Statements (2010) 2010 S7.1 - S7.3:12
The 3rd International Symposium on Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea, Final Program (2 copies); Letter correspondence between Jon Van Dyke, Dr.Te-Hsing Shan (Director of the Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica), and Dr.Cheng-Yi Lin (Executive Director of the Center For Asia-Pacific Research Studies, Academia Sinica) about "an international conference on "Major Law and Policy Issues in the South China Sea" (2011) 2011 S7.1 - S7.3:13
Air, Land, and Sea: A Comparative Analysis by Jon Van Dyke S7.1 - S7.3:14
Sharing the FIsh '06 - Allocation issues in Fisheries Management article regarding "Allocating Fish across jurisdictions" by Jon Van Dyke S7.1 - S7.3:15
Ocean Development & International Law article regarding "An Analysis of the Aegean Disputes under International Law" by Jon Van Dyke (2005) 2005 S7.1 - S7.3:16
Hawaii Bar Journal article regarding "An Introduction to the Rights of the Native Hawaiian People" by Jon Van Dyke and Melody K. Mackenzie (2006) 2006 S7.1 - S7.3:17
Ocean Development & International Law article regarding "Applying the Precautionary Principle to Ocean Shipments of Radioactive Materials" by Jon Van Dyke (1996) 1996 S7.1 - S7.3:18
Colo. J. Int'l Envtl. L. & Pol'y article regarding "Balancing Navigational Freedom with Environmental and Security Concerns" by Jon Van Dyke S7.1 - S7.3:19
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Syllabus (by Jon Van Dyke); divider; excerpts from Chapter 6, International Law and Litigation in the U.S. (2d ed. 2005); International Navigation 1-10, 70-122; Law of the Sea Convention Articles 1-33,235-36 2005,
2006
S7.1 - S7.3:20
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Van Dyke, Legal And Practical Problems Governing International Straits, in Ocean Yearbook 12 at 109-25 (1996), Van Dyke, The Legal Regime Governing the Gibraltar Straits, in Symposium on the Straits used for International Navigation (Istanbul 2002); Law of the Sea Convention, Articles 34-45; Van Dyke, An overview of the Jurisdictional Issues Affecting Hawaii's Ocean Waters 11 INT'L J. Marine & Coastal L 351-63 (1996); Law of the Sea Convention, Articles 46-54 1996,
2002
S7.1 - S7.3:21
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Important unresolved ocean Law Issues Ch. 6 Sec. 10; Jon M. Van Dyke, Sharing Ocean Resources In A Time of Scarcity and Selfishness; Duncan E.J. Currie and Jon M. Van Dyke, Recent Developments in the International Law Governing Shipments of Nuclear Materials and Wastes and their Implications For Sids; S7.1 - S7.3:22
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Ocean Yearbook 12; article regarding "Legal and Practical Problems Governing International Straits" by Jon Van Dyke (1996) 1996 S7.1 - S7.3:23
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 The Legal Regime Governing the Gibraltar Straits by Jon Van Dyke; Military ships and planes operating in the exclusive economic zone of another country by Jon Van Dyke (2003); The disappearing right to navigational freedom in the exclusive economic zone by Jon Van Dyke (2004) 2003,
2004
S7.1 - S7.3:24
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Ocean Policy Research Foundation, article regarding "Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone" (2005); San Diego International Law Journal Vol. 6, No. 1 article regarding "Regionalism, Fisheries, and Environment Changes in the Pacific" by Jon Van Dyke (2004); United Nations conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks , 6th Sess., Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions (1995) 1995,
2005
S7.1 - S7.3:25
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Oceanlaw.net article regarding "convention on the conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean" (2006); The George Washington International Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1 article regarding "Louis B. Sohn and the settlement of Ocean Disputes" by Jon Van Dyke (2000) 2000,
2006
S7.1 - S7.3:26
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 International workshop on the United States and the Law of the Sea, article regarding "Disputes over Islands and Maritime Boundaries in East Asia by Jon Van Dyke (2005); An Analysis of the Aegean Disputes under International Law by Jon Van Dyke (2005) 2005 S7.1 - S7.3:27
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Ocean Yearbook 18 article regarding "Whale, Submarines, and Active Sonar" by Jon M. Van Dyke, et al. (2004); Bringing New Law to Ocean Waters article regarding "The Evolution and International Acceptance of the Precautionary Principle" (2004) 2004 S7.1 - S7.3:28
International Ocean Law-Spring 2006 Ocean Responsibilities Established by International Conventions and the Duties of Developed countries to Assist Developing countries by Jon Van Dyke; Final Examination by Jon Van Dyke (2002) 2002 S7.1 - S7.3:29
The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation Toward an Ideal Security State for Northeast Asia 2025: Busan/Seoul conference: Agenda (2010); Participant Bios (2010); Draft of "Northeast Asia Regional Policy coordination in an era of fundamental change in North Korea" (2010); "National 'Ideal' Security State for Northeast Asia in 2025 (As of August 13, 2010) 2010 S7.1 - S7.3:30
The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation Toward an Ideal Security State for Northeast Asia 2025: Busan/Seoul Conference: draft of "Nuclear Order in Northeast Asia: The role of nuclear weapons in the region, non-proliferation, and the tension between disarmament and deterrence" (2010); Draft of "credibility and legitimacy: a testing time for the G20" (2010); Draft of "Asia cooperation in a global context" (2010); Draft of "Maritime Security in Northeast Asia: Naval competition and Maritime Safety" by Jon Van Dyke (2010) 2010 S7.1 - S7.3:31
The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation Toward an Ideal Security State for Northeast Asia 2025: Busan/Seoul conference: Draft of "Northeast Without the United States: Towards Pax Sinica" (2010); Draft of "Alternate Trajectories of the Roles and Influences of China and the United States in Northeast Asia and the Implications for Future Power configurations" (2010); First draft of "Rebalancing, G20 and Regional Economic Infrastructure in East Asia"; Draft of Asian Regional Policy Coordination in an Era of Fundamental Change in North Korea"; List of Participants 2010 S7.1 - S7.3:32
South China Sea Regimes - Charts + Tables Map titled "Possible EEZs in the South China Sea w/o Island Claims"; Map titled "Possible Continental Shelf Allotment in the South China Sea (Parcels as Part of Chinese Territory)" (2 copies) S7.1 - S7.3:33
South China Sea Regimes - Charts + Tables Untitled contour map; Untitled contour map; Map key with the headers "Dangers" and "Various Limits, etc."; Map Keys with the headers "Lights" and "Buoys and Beacons"; Map key with headers "Coast Features", "The Land (Natural Features)", "Control Points", "Units", "Adjectives, Adverbs and other abbreviations"; Map including Yongshu Jiao (Fiery Cross Reef) S7.1 - S7.3:34
South China Sea Regimes - Charts + Tables Table titled "Table 1 Possible Weighted Voting Setup for a spratly Maritime Regime (Without Scarborough Reef); Table titled "Table 4 Voting Weights in Two Different Types of Organizations Which include South China Sea States"; Table titled "Table 4: Breakdown of Spratly Area WIthin equidistant lines by Subzones, or "chambers"; "Table 1. Selected International Marine Resource/Environmental organizations"; Table titled "Table 1. Global Non-Resource Organizations" S7.1 - S7.3:35
South China Sea Regimes - Charts + Tables Table titled "Table 2. Global Resource/Environmental Organizations"; Table titled "Table 3. Regional Organizations"; Table titled "Table 1 Possible Weighted Voting Setup For A Spratly Maritime Regime (Without Scarborough Reef)"; Table titled "Table 1: Possible Weighted Voting Setup For A Spratly Maritime Regime (Without Scarborough Reef)" S7.1 - S7.3:36
South China Sea Regimes - Charts + Tables Handwritten note titled "Weights w/o Scarborough"; Handwritten untitled tables; Pie Chart titled "Figure 11: Percentage of the South China Sea within the Equidistant Line accruing to each Claimant in a spratly Regime. Excluding scarborough Reef; Inclusion would increase Philippines claim to 12%, but would not affect Chinese claim"; Table titled "Spratly Archipelago Worksheet" S7.1 - S7.3:37
SCS-Map Map titled "F.2" With a key that reads "occupied" in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F.3" With a key that reads "occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Has Chinese Marker but not occupied"; Map titled "F.5" with a key that reads "occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F.8" With a key that reads "Claimed by one country, Claimed by two countries , Claimed by three countries , Claimed by four countries, and claimed by five countries"; Map titled "F.10" With a key that reads "Occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F.14" with a key that reads "Occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan" S7.1 - S7.3:38
SCS-Map Map titled "F.15" with a key that reads "Occupied in 1995 by:China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F16" with a key that reads "occupied in 1995 by: China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan", Map titled "F17A" with a key that reads "occupied in 1994 by: China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F18A" with a key that reads "occupied in 1994 by:China,Philippines,Malaysia,Vietnam,Taiwan"; Map titled "F.19" with a key that reads "Occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Unoccupied"; Map titled "F.20" with a key that reads "Occupied in 1995 by China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan" S7.1 - S7.3:39
SCS-Map Map titled "F.21" with a key that reads "occupied in 1995 by: China, Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Taiwan"; Map titled "F.22a" with a key that reads "C; C&V; C&P; C&M; C, M&P;C, V&P; C, V&M; C, V&B; C,V, P&M; C, V, M&B; C, V, P&B; C, V, P, M&B"; Map Titled "F.22b" with a key that reads "C; C&V; C&P; C&M; C, M&P; C, M&B; C, V&P; C, V&P; C, V&M; C, V&B; C, V, P&M; C, V, P&M; C, V, M&B; C,V,P&B; C,V,P,M&B"; Map titled "F24A"; Map titled F.24; Map titled "F.18"; Map titled "F.17" S7.1 - S7.3:40
SCS-Map Map titled figure 1 (post-it note discarded) inclusive of the Indian ocean, China, Australia, Indonesia, and the Pacific Ocean; Map of "Central South China Sea" and the "Gulf of Tonkin" (1981); Sticky note, BHP Petroleum map titled "off-share Blocks" including a table of numbers, Vietnam, Loas, Thailand, Kampuchea, China, and the Hainan Islands; IEDS Field Service LTD map concerning "Vietnam Drilling Programmes" (1992); Sticky note to Valencia, Color coded map of China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Hainan, and the Philippines 1981,
1992
S7.1 - S7.3:41
SCS-Map Map titled "Central South China Sea", 2 Sticky notes to Valencia; Map with the description "The line equidistance between baseline claims of the south china sea littoral countries and the spratly high-tide features, super imposed on occupations and petroleum concessions", Sticky note to Valencia; Map with the description "Environmental attributes of the spratlys, superimposed on occupations and petroleum concessions", Sticky note to Valencia S7.1 - S7.3:42
SCS-Map Map with the description "Allocation of the entire South China Sea Using Lines equidistant from defensible baselines, ignoring the spratly and Paracel features, sticky note to Valencia; Map with the description "Oil fields and concessions, plus claims and occupations, in the spratly area", note to Valencia, map with the description "Plate 1. The Spratly Islands, their occupants as of 1996, and jurisdictional claims", note to Valencia; map with the description "Plate 4. China and Taiwan's "nine interrupted lines" historic claim in the South China Sea and the occupied Spratly features, note to Valencia; Map with the description "Plate 12. Allocation of the South China Sea and features out to 200 nm using equidistant lines and defensible baselines, and ignoring the Spratlys but giving full effect to the Paracels", 2 notes to Valencia S7.1 - S7.3:43
SCS-Map Map with the description "Plate 6: The Spratly multiple claim area within the equidistant line, super imposed on occupied features and oil concessions, note to Valencia" S7.1 - S7.3:44
SCS-Map Plates: Note that reads "just in case you still need the plates" (1997); map with the description "Plate 17. Line bounding all islands and drying reefs on the Spratlys proper, superimposed on claims, occupations, and petroleum concessions", note to valencia; order form titled "KLUDO" 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:45
SCS-Map Tables: List of Tables including their names Table 1 coast line/Base line Lengths and Seabed Allocations, sticky note that reads "landscape p.136"; Table 2 selected Global Non-resource Organizations, 2 notes with page numbers; Table 3 Global Resources (Environmental Organizations, 3 notes on page number; Table 4 Regional organizations, 2 notes on page number; Table 5 Breakdown of Equidistance Area by Subzones or "Chambers" S7.1 - S7.3:46
SCS-Map Tables: Sticky note containing a page numbers and fax correspondence between Mark Valencia and Annabeth Rosen boom (1997); Appendix I: Descriptions of Spratly Features, 8 notes on page numbers, Notes, and References 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:47
SCS-Map Figures: List of Figures; Figure 1 The South China Sea and the Dangerous Ground. From Morgan and Valencia 1983, note concerning page number; Figure 2 Vietnam petroleum concession block map, Western South China Sea, note concerning page number; Figure 3 proposed CCOP survey area, superimposed on occupations, claims and petroleum concessions in the Spratly area, note concerning page number S7.1 - S7.3:48
SCS-Map Figures: Figure 4 Allocation of the Spratly area according to clagett (1995). Each littoral state receives an area conforming to equidistance allocations; Figure 5 Comparison of clagett's (1995) allocations of the Spratly area via coastal general direction line lengths (light gray) and area accruing to each claimant using equidistant lines (dark gray), not concerning page number; Figure 6 comparison of this study's allocations of the Spratly area via coastal general directions like lengths (light gray) and the area accruing to each claimant using equidistant lines (dark gray) S7.1 - S7.3:49
SCS-Map Figures: Figure 7 Possible Structure of a Spratly Management Authority, note on page number; Figure 8 Allocation of Shares in a Spratly regime based on the original extent of claims within the prescott (1981) equidistant line. Excludes Scarborough Reef, note on page number; Figure 9 Allocation of Shares in a Spratly regime based on the original extent of claims within a line bounding all islands and drying reefs, as in Plate 17, note on page number; Figure 10 Allocation of Shares in a Spratly regime based on the original extent of claims within a line bounding only the main features, as in Plate 16, note on page number 1981 S7.1 - S7.3:50
SCS-Map Map with the description "Line bounding the main Spratly features, super imposed on claims, occupations and petroleum concessions, note to Valencia S7.1 - S7.3:51
SCS-Map Plates: Plate 10. Allocation of the Spratly features and surrounding waters according to rough equity and real politic concerns, note to Valencia; Plate 7 Allocation of the Spratly features and surrounding waters according to rough equity and real politic concerns note to Valencia; Plate 14. Possible boundaries of a marine park in the Spratlys, super imposed on occupations and claims, note to Valencia S7.1 - S7.3:52
SCS-Map Plates: Plate 18. Overlap of original claims in the Spratly area, superimposed on occupants and petroleum concessions, note to valencia; F.7, a picture of a series of interconnected structures possibly in the ocean; Plate 11. Allocation of the South China Sea and features out to 200 nm using equidistant lines and defensible baselines, and ignoring both the Spratly and Paracel features S7.1 - S7.3:53
SCS-Map Plate 1. The Spratly Islands, their occupants as of 1996, and jurisdictional claims; Plate 2 oil fields and concessions, Plus claims and occupations, in the Spratly area; Plate 3 (central South China Sea); Plate 4. China and Taiwan's "nine interrupted lines" historic claim in the South China Sea and the occupied Spratly features; Plate 5 picture of structure potentially in the ocean; Plate 6 The Spratly multiple claim are within the equidistant line, superimposed on occupied features and oil concessions S7.1 - S7.3:54
SCS-Map Plate 7 Allocation of the Spratly features and surrounding waters according to rough equity and realpolitik concerns; Plate 8. Allocation of the entire South China Sea using lines equidistant from defensible baselines, ignoring both the Spratly and the Paracel features; Plate 9, Plate 10, Plate 11 Allocation of the South China Sea and features out to 200 nm using equidistant lines and defensible baselines S7.1 - S7.3:55
SCS-Map Plates 12 through 18; Two notes that were attached to the exterior folder concerning the date ("1994-95?") and "Bibliography for App I scheduled" S7.1 - S7.3:56
SCS-Book Reviews and Marketing The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol 14, No 1. entry concerning "The Chinese Traditional Maritime Boundary Line in the South China Sea and its Legal consequences for the Resolution of the Dispute over the Spratly Islands" (1999) 1999 S7.1 - S7.3:57
SCS-Book Reviews and Marketing Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIs) Malaysia issue paper regarding "The Spratlys Disputes and Prospects for settlement" (1992) 1992 S7.1 - S7.3:58
SCS-Book Reviews and Marketing List of "Possible Reviewers in Southeast Asia (1997) 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:59
SCS-Book Reviews and Marketing Kluwer Law International New Publication regarding "sharing the Resources of the South China Sea by Jon Van Dyke, et al.; The East-West Center New Release flyer regarding "New Book proposes Interim Solution to Southeast Asia Spratly Disputes" (1997) 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:60
SCS-Book Reviews and Marketing University of Hawaii Law Review entry regarding "Stopping Spats Over the Specks called Spratly Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" by Jon Van Dyke, et al. (1997); University of Hawaii Press Order form of "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea"; Kluwer Law International book advertisement and order form on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea"; Laminated sample cover of "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:61
SCS-Map Fax Correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Mark J Valencia about a Book Review published in The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law regarding "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" by Jon Van Dyke, et al. (1997), Bibliography of Books and Periodical Articles on Marine and Coastal Law, note to Jon on the attached XVI articles on Chinese Law on EEZs and Continental Shelves 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:62
SCS-Book Reviews American Journal of International Law Vol. 92 No. 2 Book Review regarding "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" by Jon Van Dyke, et al. (1998); Social Alternatives review titled "Contesting mudstone" regarding "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" (1998); Ocean Development & International Law Book Review on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" (1999) 1999 S7.1 - S7.3:63
SCS-Book Reviews Essay regarding "Conflict Resolutions in the Spratly Islands" by Prof. Dr. Hasjim Djalal (1999) 1999 S7.1 - S7.3:64
SCS-Book Reviews List of "Invitees for Reception for "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea"; (October 14, 1997, 5 - 6:30, Eastwest Center)"; fliers of the "Sharing the Resources of the South China" event at the East-West center (1997); email correspondence between Brien Hallett and Jon regarding a Book Review Hallett wrote on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" (1998); Handwritten note to Jon From Brien regarding "Sharing Resources ..." attached is Brieni's review published in Social Alternatives titled "The Environment and Social Theory: A Piece of Resistance" (1998) 1997,
1998
S7.1 - S7.3:65
SCS-Book Reviews Jon Van Dyke's mailing list for a reception; Email correspondence between Jon, Larry, and Brien about Jon's mailing list for a reception (1997); Center for Chinese Studies Faculty mailing info 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:66
SCS-Book Reviews Handwritten note regarding Dean Foster's list of invitees to the JVD reception attached to the list of invitees; Handwritten note regarding the mailing list and labels for book signing event attached to the mailing list; Handwritten note from Brien to Jon regarding the attached names given by the Asian Studies People (1997) 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:67
SCS-Book Reviews Email correspondence between Noel Ludwig and Jon Van Dyke regarding the "Guest list" (1997); Business card of Willem E.C. Van Kemenade; Letter of correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Peter Buschman about "Review Copies for 'Sharing the resources of the South China Sea"' (1997); Email correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Peter Buschman about "The South China Sea" (1997); Email correspondence between Alison Conner and Jon Van Dyke about the names and addresses for the Singapore journals" (1997) 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:68
SCS-Book Reviews Fax correspondence between Peter Buschman Kiawer and Jon Van Dyke about the attached: East-West Center flier on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" Kluwer academic publishers group Marketing Questionnaire", and Kluwer Law International Guide to Discipline codes (1997); note to valencia attached to East-West center flier on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" (1997); 1997 S7.1 - S7.3:69
SCS-Book Reviews Fax correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Mark Valencia about sharing a copy of their book with a South China Sea Workshop Participant (1997); Copy of the business cards of Noor Farida Afiffin and Zheng Xuefang, Business card of Willem Van Kemenade; Letter of correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Zheng Xue Fang about an analysis on "Sharing the Resources of the South China Sea" (1998); Letter correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Noor Farida Affrin about an analysis of Jon's book (1998) 1997,
1998
S7.1 - S7.3:70
Ireland v. The United Kingdom, Dispute concerning Access to Information Under Article 9 of the ospar convention (2002) 2002 S7.1 - S7.3:71
Ireland v. United States, In the Dispute concerning the MOX Plant, et al., Request for Provisional Measures and Statement of case of Ireland (2001), Table of Annexes 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:72
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Press Release on "The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) Request for Provisional Measures submitted by Ireland" (2001); Email of correspondence between Jon Van Dyke, Shaun Burnie, et al. about Ireland files itolos docs" (2001); Email correspondence between David Lowry, Tom Clements, et al. about NW: Sellafield Update (2001); Email correspondence between Shaun Burnie, Jon Van Dyke, et al. about "Itlos case next week" (2001); EMail correspondence Shaun Burnie, Daman Moglen, et al. about Irish Law of the Sea Case (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:73
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Press Release on "The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom) Request for Provisional Measures submitted by Ireland" (2001); Email of correspondence between Jon Van Dyke, Shaun Burnie, et al. about Ireland files itolos docs" (2001); Email correspondence between David Lowry, Tom Clements, et al. about NW: Sellafield Update (2001); Email correspondence between Shaun Burnie, Jon Van Dyke, et al. about "ITLOS case next week" (2001); Email correspondence Shaun Burnie, Daman Moglen, et al. about Irish Law of the Sea Case (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:74
Memorial Amicus curiae of Greenpeace International, Amicus Brief (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:75
Ireland v. United Kingdom, The Mox Plant Case, Request for provisional measures, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:76
International Law Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, "Order in the Mox Plant Case" Press Release (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:77
Lecture notes on "The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. U.K.) S7.1 - S7.3:78
New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan (Southern Bluefin Tuna cases) Requests for provisional measures (2000) 2000 S7.1 - S7.3:79
Transparency titled "The Southern Bluefin Tuna cases (New Zealand and Australia v. Japan) (ITLOS 1999) 1999 S7.1 - S7.3:80
International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration Press Release on Hearings in Ireland-United Kingdom Arbitration under OSPAR convention to be held at Peace Palace in the Hague (2002) 2002 S7.1 - S7.3:81
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS): The Mox Plant Case, Ireland v. United Kingdom, Request for Provisional measures, No. 10 (2001) 2001 S7.1 - S7.3:82
The Dalhousie Law Journal, "Proof of Offshore Territorial Claims in Canada" (1982-83) 1982,
1983
S7.1 - S7.3:83
Fax correspondence between Jon Van Dyke and Tom Clements about a "copy of DoT Hazmat Exemption to Southern California Edison" (2003); Southern California Edison Exemption, DoT-E 12871 (2003) 2003 S7.1 - S7.3:84
Draft Law for Nuclear Safety approved by the Governing Assembly of the Republic of Chile, Law-18302, (2002) 2002 S7.1 - S7.3:85

Jon Van Dyke Collection Finding Aid